Honesty doctrine. Every candidate anomaly is an artifact until proven otherwise; in-sample results are never findings; past statistical regularity does not imply future returns. This is research on statistical properties of market data — not investment advice, not a trading system.

Research / research/bibliography.md

Bibliography

reviewed

Bibliography · created Tue Aug 11 2026 20:00:00 GMT-0400 (heure avancée de l’Est) · updated Tue Aug 11 2026 20:00:00 GMT-0400 (heure avancée de l’Est) · Simon-Pierre Boucher

Bibliography#

Every consulted source, with URL and access date. All entries verified against OpenAlex on 2026-08-12 (metadata: title, authors, year, venue, DOI). Where online/print years differ, the print-issue year is used with the online year noted in the theme notes. Theme notes in research/notes/.

§4.1 — Short-horizon anomalies & lead-lag#

§4.1 — Calendar & intraday effects#

§4.1 — Post-publication decay#

  • Schwert, G. W. (2003). Anomalies and Market Efficiency. Handbook of the Economics of Finance, 939–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0102(03)01024-0 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • McLean, R. D. & Pontiff, J. (2016). Does Academic Research Destroy Stock Return Predictability? Journal of Finance 71(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12365 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Marquering, W., Nisser, J. & Valla, T. (2006). Disappearing anomalies: a dynamic analysis of the persistence of anomalies. Applied Financial Economics 16(4), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603100500400361 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Chordia, T., Subrahmanyam, A. & Tong, Q. (2014). Have capital market anomalies attenuated in the recent era of high liquidity and trading activity? Journal of Accounting and Economics 58(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.06.001 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Jacobs, H. & Müller, S. (2020). Anomalies across the globe: Once public, no longer existent? Journal of Financial Economics 135(1), 213–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2019.06.004 (accessed 2026-08-12)

§4.2 — Multiple testing, data snooping, backtest overfitting#

  • White, H. (2000). A Reality Check for Data Snooping. Econometrica 68(5), 1097–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00152 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Sullivan, R., Timmermann, A. & White, H. (2001). Dangers of data mining: The case of calendar effects in stock returns. Journal of Econometrics 105(1), 249–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-4076(01)00077-x (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Hansen, P. R. (2005). A Test for Superior Predictive Ability. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 23(4), 365–380. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500105000000063 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Romano, J. P. & Wolf, M. (2005). Stepwise Multiple Testing as Formalized Data Snooping. Econometrica 73(4), 1237–1282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2005.00615.x (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Benjamini, Y. & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the False Discovery Rate: A Practical and Powerful Approach to Multiple Testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Harvey, C. R., Liu, Y. & Zhu, H. (2016). …and the Cross-Section of Expected Returns. Review of Financial Studies 29(1), 5–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv059 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Harvey, C. R. (2017). Presidential Address: The Scientific Outlook in Financial Economics. Journal of Finance 72(4), 1399–1440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12530 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Bailey, D. H. & López de Prado, M. (2014). The Deflated Sharpe Ratio: Correcting for Selection Bias, Backtest Overfitting, and Non-Normality. Journal of Portfolio Management 40(5), 94–107. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2014.40.5.094 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., López de Prado, M. & Zhu, Q. J. (2014). Pseudo-Mathematics and Financial Charlatanism: The Effects of Backtest Overfitting on Out-of-Sample Performance. Notices of the AMS 61(5), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1090/noti1105 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Bailey, D. H., Borwein, J. M., López de Prado, M. & Zhu, Q. J. (2016). The probability of backtest overfitting. Journal of Computational Finance 20(4), 39–69. https://doi.org/10.21314/jcf.2016.322 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Hou, K., Xue, C. & Zhang, L. (2020). Replicating Anomalies. Review of Financial Studies 33(5), 2019–2133. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhy131 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Jensen, T. I., Kelly, B. & Pedersen, L. H. (2023). Is There a Replication Crisis in Finance? Journal of Finance 78(5), 2465–2518. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13249 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Chordia, T., Goyal, A. & Saretto, A. (2020). Anomalies and False Rejections. Review of Financial Studies 33(5), 2134–2179. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa018 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Harvey, C. R. & Liu, Y. (2020). False (and Missed) Discoveries in Financial Economics. Journal of Finance 75(5), 2503–2553. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12951 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Giglio, S., Liao, Y. & Xiu, D. (2021). Thousands of Alpha Tests. Review of Financial Studies 34(7), 3456–3496. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhaa111 (accessed 2026-08-12)

§4.3 — Microstructure & artifacts#

  • Roll, R. (1984). A Simple Implicit Measure of the Effective Bid-Ask Spread in an Efficient Market. Journal of Finance 39(4), 1127–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1984.tb03897.x (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Blume, M. E. & Stambaugh, R. F. (1983). Biases in computed returns: An application to the size effect. Journal of Financial Economics 12(3), 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405x(83)90056-9 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Fisher, L. (1966). Some New Stock-Market Indexes. Journal of Business 39(S1), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1086/294848 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Zhang, L., Mykland, P. A. & Aït-Sahalia, Y. (2005). A Tale of Two Time Scales: Determining Integrated Volatility with Noisy High-Frequency Data. JASA 100(472), 1394–1411. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214505000000169 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Aït-Sahalia, Y., Mykland, P. A. & Zhang, L. (2005). How Often to Sample a Continuous-Time Process in the Presence of Market Microstructure Noise. Review of Financial Studies 18(2), 351–416. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhi016 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Hansen, P. R. & Lunde, A. (2006). Realized Variance and Market Microstructure Noise. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 24(2), 127–161. https://doi.org/10.1198/073500106000000071 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Bandi, F. M. & Russell, J. R. (2006). Separating microstructure noise from volatility. Journal of Financial Economics 79(3), 655–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2005.01.005 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Bandi, F. M. & Russell, J. R. (2008). Microstructure Noise, Realized Variance, and Optimal Sampling. Review of Economic Studies 75(2), 339–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00474.x (accessed 2026-08-12)

§4.4 — Time-series methodology#

§4.5 — Transaction costs#

  • Hasbrouck, J. (2009). Trading Costs and Returns for U.S. Equities: Estimating Effective Costs from Daily Data. Journal of Finance 64(3), 1445–1477. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01469.x (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Corwin, S. A. & Schultz, P. (2012). A Simple Way to Estimate Bid-Ask Spreads from Daily High and Low Prices. Journal of Finance 67(2), 719–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2012.01729.x (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Abdi, F. & Ranaldo, A. (2017). A Simple Estimation of Bid-Ask Spreads from Daily Close, High, and Low Prices. Review of Financial Studies 30(12), 4437–4480. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx084 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Ardia, D., Guidotti, E. & Kroencke, T. A. (2024). Efficient estimation of bid–ask spreads from open, high, low, and close prices. Journal of Financial Economics 161, 103916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2024.103916 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Fong, K. Y. L., Holden, C. W. & Trzcinka, C. A. (2017). What Are the Best Liquidity Proxies for Global Research? Review of Finance 21(4), 1355–1401. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfx003 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Lesmond, D. A., Ogden, J. P. & Trzcinka, C. A. (1999). A New Estimate of Transaction Costs. Review of Financial Studies 12(5), 1113–1141. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/12.5.1113 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Bessembinder, H. (2003). Issues in Assessing Trade Execution Costs. Journal of Financial Markets 6(3), 233–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1386-4181(02)00064-2 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Novy-Marx, R. & Velikov, M. (2016). A Taxonomy of Anomalies and Their Trading Costs. Review of Financial Studies 29(1), 104–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv063 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Frazzini, A., Israel, R. & Moskowitz, T. J. (2012). Trading Costs of Asset Pricing Anomalies. SSRN working paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2294498 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Chen, A. Y. & Velikov, M. (2022). Zeroing In on the Expected Returns of Anomalies. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 58(3), 968–1004. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022109022000874 (accessed 2026-08-12)
  • Detzel, A., Novy-Marx, R. & Velikov, M. (2023). Model Comparison with Transaction Costs. Journal of Finance 78(3), 1743–1775. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13225 (accessed 2026-08-12)

§4.6 — This dataset#

  • HF Market Data API documentation & OpenAPI schema. https://www.hfmarketdata.io/docs (accessed 2026-08-12) — capabilities established empirically in research/data_source_profile.md (Experiment A).